Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Cell Rep Methods ; 2(10): 100314, 2022 Oct 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2031227

ABSTRACT

Mesenchymal cells are necessary for organ development. In the lung, distal tip fibroblasts contribute to alveolar and airway epithelial cell differentiation and homeostasis. Here, we report a method for generating human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived mesenchymal cells (iMESs) that can induce human iPSC-derived alveolar and airway epithelial lineages in organoids via epithelial-mesenchymal interaction, without the use of allogenic fetal lung fibroblasts. Through a transcriptome comparison of dermal and lung fibroblasts with their corresponding reprogrammed iPSC-derived iMESs, we found that iMESs had features of lung mesenchyme with the potential to induce alveolar type 2 (AT2) cells. Particularly, RSPO2 and RSPO3 expressed in iMESs directly contributed to AT2 cell induction during organoid formation. We demonstrated that the total iPSC-derived alveolar organoids were useful for characterizing responses to the influenza A (H1N1) virus and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, demonstrating their utility for disease modeling.

3.
Respir Investig ; 60(4): 607-611, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1773723

ABSTRACT

The Japanese government's latest manual on COVID-19 management mentions non-invasive ventilation (NIV). Before this version, we experienced three cases in which COVID-19 was a concern. Each case had one of the following conditions: obesity hypoventilation syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, acute heart failure with acute kidney injury with hypercapnia. The guidelines indicate that patients with these diseases are good candidates for NIV. NIV was used in a negative pressure room with staff in personal protective equipment. We describe the use of NIV instruments with anti-viral filters and a non-vented mask, including a new NIV machine for COVID-19 respiratory care.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Noninvasive Ventilation , Respiratory Insufficiency , Humans , Masks , Pandemics , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Ventilators, Mechanical
4.
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol ; 11(1): 94-103, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1520276

ABSTRACT

Remdesivir, a prodrug of the nucleoside analog GS-441524, plays a key role in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, owing to limited information on clinical trials and inexperienced clinical use, there is a lack of pharmacokinetic (PK) data in patients with COVID-19 with special characteristics. In this study, we aimed to measure serum GS-441524 concentrations and develop a population PK (PopPK) model. Remdesivir was administered at a 200 mg loading dose on the first day followed by 100 mg from day 2, based on the package insert, in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) greater than or equal to 30 ml/min. In total, 190 concentrations from 37 Japanese patients were used in the analysis. The GS-441524 trough concentrations were significantly higher in the eGFR less than 60 ml/min group than in the eGFR greater than or equal to 60 ml/min group. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in four patients hardly affected the total body clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (Vd ) of GS-441524. A one-compartment model described serum GS-441524 concentration data. The CL and Vd of GS-441524 were significantly affected by eGFR readjusted by individual body surface area and age, respectively. Simulations proposed a dose regimen of 200 mg on day 1 followed by 100 mg once every 2 days from day 2 in patients with an eGFR of 30 ml/min or less. In conclusion, we successfully established a PopPK model of GS-441524 using retrospectively obtained serum GS-441524 concentrations in Japanese patients with COVID-19, which would be helpful for optimal individualized therapy of remdesivir.


Subject(s)
Adenosine Monophosphate/analogs & derivatives , Adenosine/analogs & derivatives , Alanine/analogs & derivatives , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Kidney Diseases/blood , Adenosine/blood , Adenosine Monophosphate/administration & dosage , Adenosine Monophosphate/pharmacokinetics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alanine/administration & dosage , Alanine/pharmacokinetics , Body Surface Area , COVID-19/blood , Drug Administration Schedule , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Female , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Monte Carlo Method , Precision Medicine , Retrospective Studies
5.
Intern Med ; 60(10): 1649-1650, 2021 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1511910

Subject(s)
Cough , Phonetics , Aerosols , Humans
6.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 8(7): ofab282, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1320321

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Detailed differences in clinical information between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia (CP), which is the main phenotype of SARS-CoV-2 disease, and influenza pneumonia (IP) are still unclear. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted by including patients with CP who were hospitalized between January and June 2020 and a retrospective cohort of patients with IP hospitalized from 2009 to 2020. We compared the clinical presentations and studied the prognostic factors of CP and IP. RESULTS: Compared with the IP group (n = 66), in the multivariate analysis, the CP group (n = 362) had a lower percentage of patients with underlying asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P < .01), lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (P < .01), lower systolic blood pressure (P < .01), higher diastolic blood pressure (P < .01), lower aspartate aminotransferase level (P < .05), higher serum sodium level (P < .05), and more frequent multilobar infiltrates (P < .05). The diagnostic scoring system based on these findings showed excellent differentiation between CP and IP (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.889). Moreover, the prognostic predictors were different between CP and IP. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive differences between CP and IP were revealed, highlighting the need for early differentiation between these 2 pneumonias in clinical settings.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL